Crowdsource This Blog Post
A helvetica-fonted brand name running into a gradient-shaded blue square.
One question remains, however.Harking on the theme I brought up in my first Confessional post, curving the dialogue around the creation of a replacement ugly logo, Gap insured that they would be the on the tip of everyone's tongues.
Could Gap not have been satisfied by the social media bump they experienced after the Groupon spectacle that they had to one-up themselves with this logo fiasco?
If it was just a publicity stunt, it's unclear if this will pay off.
From what I've seen, there's a seething anger coming from designers and consumers alike, calling for boycotts of Gap and claims of being unethical.
Regardless of what it truly was, we'll see how this hurt/helped Gap in the coming months.
Do you think this was some publicity stunt or just another example of the mishandling of a social marketing initiative?
Shout outs to @GapLogo, @OldGapLogo, craplogo.me, and the dozens of other new media machinations created during the brouhaha.

